NOTE: All of the remaining Divisions have typical higher plant pigments: chl a, b; beta-carotene, several xanthophylls (e.g. lutein, neoxanthin, violaxanthin, zeaxanthin)

 

DIVISIONS HEPATOPHYTA & ANTHOCEROTOPHYTA

* hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) predominantly terrestrial; Anthoceros rarely in permanent lakes

* liverworts (Hepatophyta) also mainly terrestrial, but many spp. have aquatic morphs (different from terrestrial forms), esp. in lotic, less commonly in lacustrine waters:

Riccia fairly common along the edge, Ricciocarpus is pleustonic (floating), much like Lemna; both favor eutrophic water Hutch. III, Figs. 22, 23

 

DIVISION BRYOPHYTA (Mosses)

Hutchinson II, Fig. 4; III, Fig. 24

Order Sphagnales

* common in low-Ca, acidic damps soils to lake margins

* some spp. submergent, others floating mats: quaking bogs = terminal phase of acid lake history

* lake margin Sphagnum communities often have complex spp. zonations related to moisture content, pH, light (shading by trees/shrubs)

Order Bryales

* favor soft & moderately hard waters: cannot use HCO3- in photosynthesis

* most common in lotic, but also present in lacustrine habitats, up to 120 m in Lake Tahoe

* like liverworts & Charophytes, can grow much deeper (lower light) than angiosperms, and compete well w/ latter only when substrate is rocky therefore unfavorable for angiosperms

* growth at great depth possible only in clear, oligotrophic lakes, so mosses decrease with eutrophication

* common, largely aquatic genera incl. Fissidens, Fontinalis, Drepanocladus

 

TRACHEOPHYTES (Vascular Plants)

* subsequent to explosive colonization of land by tracheophytes, a few (1-2%) secondarily adapted to FW (and even fewer into the sea)

* many retain relics of terrestrial existence, e.g. a thin cuticle, vestigial stomata, poorly lignified xylem, nonmotile sperm, aerial pollination (most), the latter often insect assisted

* aquatic tracheophytes a phylogenetically complex, polyphyletic assemblage

* most rooted in substratum, some free-floating in or on water, a few epiphytic

* morphological reduction common, both vegetative & reproductive

* relevance to humans stems largely from perceived "nuisance" status, interfering w/ navigation, fisheries, irrigation, etc.

 

DIVISION MICROPHYLLOPHYTA (= subdivision Lycopsida)

* vascularized leaves & roots; sporophylls w/ adaxial sporangia

 

1. Lycopodium ("club mosses", though not really a moss (Bryophyta))

* lacks ligules, small membranous appendages at base of "leaves"

* most are terrestrial, but L. inundatum occurs in marginal or eulittoral flora in the Arctic

2. Isoetes spp. ("quillworts") Hutch. III, Fig. 26

* cosmopolitan, esp. in unproductive softwater lakes

* rosettelike w/ simple, unbranched leaves from an underground "corm"

* readily outcompeted by angiosperms

* primitive vascular anatomy

 

DIVISION ARTHROPHYTA ("jointed plants")

* sole extant genus is Equisetum (= horsetail rushes) Bold et al. Fig. 15-1

* common emergent plant in north temperate lakes (up to 1.5 m deep)

* whorled leaves & branches which arise alternately from stem nodes (very unusual)

* stem is the dominant organ, w/ leaves greatly reduced & essentially vestigial

 

DIVISION PTERIDOPHYTA (Ferns)

Ceratopteris - pan(sub)tropical genus, pleustonic at or near surface Hutch. II, Fig. 4H

Order Marsilales/ Family Marsileaceae (water clovers) - incl. 3 widespread (esp. warmer areas) genera, 2 occurring in Oklahoma: Marsilea ("water clover"; quadrifoliate leaves) & Pilularia ("pillwort"; filiform leaves) Hutch. II, Fig. 4G

* perennial herbs rooting in shallow water or moist soil

* erect, spreading or floating leaves

* sexual reprod. by sporocarps borne from rhizome; contain both micro- & megaspores

Order Salviniales/ Family Salviniaceae (water ferns) - only 2 extant genera, widespread esp. in warmer climates: Azolla & Salvinia (most spp. native to Africa, only 1 in U.S.), only the former known from OK Hutch. II, Fig. 4E,F

* small floating plants, plants monoecious but us. w/ dioecious sporocarps

* Azolla - branching stems, alternate bilobed leaves, true roots, and hosts symbiotic Anabaena azollae (Cyanophyta) which probably fixes N2

* Salvinia - simple (unlobed) leaves, lacks true roots (modified filiform leaf segments)

 

DIVISION CONIFEROPHYTA (Gymnosperms)

Gymnosperms in general are notably absent from aquatic habitats. In southeastern U.S., Taxodium distichum (cypress) is a common swamp/wetland tree. Hutchinson considers it of marginal limnological importance.

 

DIVISION ANTHOPHYTA (Angiosperms or flowering plants)

* Difficult to define aquatic angiosperms b/c many or most terrestrial plants may at some time become submersed.

* Sculthorpe lists 28 families (excluding Pteridophytes) of "more or less exclusive hydrophytes", 4 of which are all or predominantly marine/brackish.

* Of the 24 FW families sensu Sculthorpe, 14 are listed by Nelson & Couch and 3 more by Tyrl as having OK reps; most of the remaining 7 families are (sub)tropical. However, Nelson & Couch list 9 other families not included by Sculthorpe. Obviously, it is a subjective call, esp. on local/regional scale where only one or a few oddball spp. from a family may occur.

Sculthorpe Table 1.2a, b; Hutch. III, Table 6; Raven et al. Table 16-1

* In general, hydrophytes believed to be evolutionarily recent descendents of terrestrial ancestors*, and as a rule favor high light (shallow water). Phylogeny seems uncertain. *An exception may be Ceratophyllum, which DNA evidence suggests to be one of the most basal clades of angiosperms (see Raven et al. 1999, p. 526).

* Whereas in terrestrial plants dicots outnumber monocots by 4:1 or 5:1, FW monocots outnumber dicots, esp. in lentic/lacustrine systems.

* Among dicots the Ranales (prob. most nearly albeit distantly related to monocots) are the best represented order, while the largest dicot family, Asteraceae, has few aquatic spp., as do the woody families.

 

Hutchinson (Vol. III, p. 80) summarizes as follows:

"A number of otherwise terrestrial families may contain isolated aquatic genera and species, but most of the characteristic lacustrine plants, particularly those that are submersed, belong to a restricted number of specialized families containing few genera of immensely wide distribution.... Within such widely distributed genera, there are sometimes, as in Potamogeton, very many spp., but more usually the number of species is quite small.... The range of the average species of water plant is greater than that of the average land plant*.... Within a genus, large or small, species of immense range, e.g. P. crispus and Ceratophyllum demersum, may occur... essentially throughout the world."

* I presume this reflects the susceptibility of terrestrial but not aquatic plants to water availability and temperature extremes.

 

Life Forms/Ecological Classification of Tracheophytes

* Ecological perspective: life/growth form of aquatic plants prob. more useful than phylogeny.

* Bases for categories incl. morphological similarities (convergence) and/or habitat characteristics, namely relation to water level and substratum.

Sculthorpe Table 1.1; Hutch. III, Table 7; Riemer Fig. 6.1

Hutchinson notes the following generalizations (no doubt many exceptions; refer to Table 7 for codes):

larger, oligotrophic, exposed lakes

graminid emergents (B.I.a) nearshore

floating-leaved plants (B.II.a,b) sheltered "offshore"

* submerged isoetid rosulates (B.III.b.3)

smaller, eutrophic, sheltered lakes

more foliaceous emergents (B.I.f) nearshore

more prominent floating-leaved flora

* submerged plants dominated by vittate forms (B.III.a)

* This distinction may suggest differential relative reliance on sediments vs. water column for nutrition.

* Salviniids (A.I.b) and eichhornids (A.I.d; e.g. water hyacinth) are often transitory pests.

* Smaller pleustonic spp. (A.I.a) are mainly in the littoral of eutrophic lakes.

* Other pleustonic plants (A.I.c,e) occur lakeward of floating-leaved plants.

 

Vascular Plant Biogeography (Sculthorpe)

* ~30-35% hydrophytes = cosmopolitan/intercontinental (esp. north temperate zone w/ large contiguous land mass); difficult to explain given wide separation of populations by land masses and oceans: spread by migratory waterfowl?

* ~40% hydrophytes = continental/regional; this is a much lower % than for terrestrial plants

* ~25-30% hydrophytes = endemic (very restricted) spp.; mostly tropical forms

Hydrophyte (or any organism) biogeography should not be thought of as static: ranges are constantly and presently expanding and contracting.

 

 

EMERGENT FOLIAGE: STRUCTURE & PHYSIOLOGY

 

* Remember that hydrophytes evolved from terrestrial ancestors, NOT directly from more primitive aquatic forms, and most retain some traits that are maladaptive to aquatic existence

* No major differences in anatomy of emergent structures of hydrophytes vs. terrestrial plants

* Young, initially submerged foliage must often tolerate low O2, and usually form arenchyma tissue near the water surface

* Subtle changes in still submerged developing plants include:

* decreased leaf thickness & hairiness, stomatal density and cuticle thickness

* leaf shape alterations

* increased spongy mesophyll volume

 

Emergent Leaves

 

1. Monocots (e.g. Typha, Phragmites)

* rhizomatous w/ more or less linear leaves

* stomata on all surfaces of leaves

* typically no palisade/spongy mesophyll distinction

* colorless epidermal cells (except guard cells)

* generally typical monocot vascular bundle anatomy & cell types

 

2. Dicots (e.g. Ludwigia)

* most produce erect leafy stems, w/ leaves having typical terrestrial dicot anatomy

* often stomata on both surfaces

* colorless epidermal cells (except guard cells)

* distinct upper palisade/lower spongy mesophyll

* petiole w/ ring of widely spaced vascular bundles in transsection and lacunate cortex

 

3. Physiology

* main problem is hypoxia below water, esp. near sediment: prolonged anaerobic resp.?

* Extensive lacunal system in mesophyll continuous through petiole, stem & rhizomes/roots provides channel for O2 diffusion, aided by Ps O2 evolution during day.

* Emergent hydrophytes transpire freely, esp. during day; some also show guttation.

* Depending on spp., aerenchyma near the water sfc. formed from either the vascular or cork cambium (latter = phellogen); basically, aerenchyma seems to be a specialized form of cork

* Organs possessing aerenchyma often lack an extensive lacunar system, so may serve as O2 storing tissue and/or for floatation; seems NOT to be respiratory tissue. Sculthorpe Fig. 3.3

 

4. Effects of submergence

* Although variable w/ spp., often submersed leaves are longer and narrower than emergent leaves of the same sp. Sculthorpe Figs. 3.5, 3.6

* Other, mainly quantitative, alterations frequently observed upon submersion include:

* more erect stems, longer internodes, sparser branching and root development

* decreased leaf thickness, hairiness (glabrous = without hair) & Chl content

* increased non-photosynthetic pigments (anthocyanins, anthoxanthins)

* increased spongy relative to palisade mesophyll thus increased air spaces

* development of chloroplasts in epidermis and altered stomatal distribution

* decreased xylem & supportive tissue and increased lacunar development in submersed stems

 

 

 

FLOATING LEAVES: STRUCTURE & PHYSIOLOGY

 

* Strong selective pressures on floating leaves have resulted in striking parallel evolution in all plants of this type regardless of phylogeny.

* Major problem is physical stress of wind, waves, rain: favors leathery, circular, entire, peltate (attached in center) leaves w/ long flexible petioles and collenchyma-reinforced primary veins, more or less evident in various families; still, most floating-leaved plants are restricted to relatively calm and shallow waters. Sculthorpe Figs. 4.1, 4.2

* Another unique problem = exposure to both air & water: thick cuticle and functional stomata only on upper sfc. for gas exchange (sporadic relict stomata on lower sfc.); upper palisade mesophyll w/ extensive lacunate spongy mesophyll of columnar cells; latter aids buoyancy while structural tissue adds strength. Sculthorpe Figs. 4.8, 4.9A

* With a 2-dimensional space to array leaves, competition for light is intense: long petioles or stems permit spreading of leaves to avoid overlap, which nevertheless occurs in dense stands.

* Petioles rapidly resume growth (both cell division & elongation) if leaves become submerged.

* The causal factor(s) of growth cessation at the air/water interface are not known, and occasionally some spp. (Nuphar, Nymphaea) will produce emergent leaves in dense stands.

* Floating leaf primordia from a benthic rhizome may take years to develop, and early development in water again may be hypoxic and require high osmotic pressure in the cells.

* Typically lack vessels, having only tracheids in xylem.

* Stranded plants of emersion-tolerant spp. form close rosettes of reduced leaves w/ fewer stomata and infurled margins.

 

 

SUBMERGED ORGANS

Morphology

* Greatly decreased structural support tissue, unlignified, us. w/ little or no collenchyma/sclerenchyma; greatly reduced mesophyll w/ little dorsiventral differentiation due to random orientation of leaves toward light Sculthorpe Fig. 5.10

* Extremely thin cuticle and leaves, and presence of chloroplasts in epidermis (sometimes more than in mesophyll, e.g. spp. of Ceratophyllum, Myriophyllum, Potamogeton), mimic terrestrial shade leaves, and probably reflect low PFD rather than adaptations to aquatic existence per se.

* Two major growth forms based on differing apical organization:

1. flat, broad shoot apex: short axis producing rosette of radical leaves (directly from roots; e.g. Isoetes)

2. long, narrow shoot apex: elongated flexuous stem covered w/ leaves and rooted (sometimes sparsely) from nodes (e.g. Elodea)

* leaves either alternate (e.g. Potamogeton), paired/opposite (e.g. Cabomba) or whorled (e.g. Elodea, Myriophyllum)

* sympodial growth (no dominant shoot axis), older tissues dying

* axillary buds may occur at every leaf or only at intervals of 2-12 nodes (spp.-dependent)

* Three main types of leaves, only two of which are common:

1. entire: most common in both mono- and dicots of all habitats and climate zones

* us. thin, translucent, very elongate (esp. in rosette spp.)

* variously filiform or setaceous (e.g. Potamogeton pectinatus), small linear (e.g. Elodea) or ribbon-like (e.g. P. spp., Sagittaria spp.); and flat, undulate or bullate according to spp.

2. dissected: common in many dicots from tropics to temperate waters

* many free segments radiating from petiole, w/ various orders of dissection and length/thickness depending on sp. and conditions

* putative benefit of increased SA:V ratio relative to entire leaves not definitively demonstrated

 

 

Physiology

* Gas diffusion through water is 100-1000x slower than in air, and PFD is reduced, so SA:V and boundary layers are important factors in hydrophyte physiology.

* Typical anatomical features, e.g. thin leaves, cell walls & cuticle, and extensive air spaces facilitate dissolved gas and ion diffusion to/from cells

* HCO3- as well as CO2 can be used for photosynthesis in many submerged macrophytes Spence & Maberly Tables III, IV, VI, VII

Note: [Ct] = [DIC] = [CO2 (aq)] + [HCO3-] + [CO32-] (HCO3- us. dominates)

Alk = [HCO3-] + 2[CO32-] + [OH-] - [H+]

Ct/Alk = quotient of final [Ct] over alkalinity in a pH-drift expt. A low value means little Ct remains after Ps uptake, a high value means most Ct in sol'n is photosynthetically unavailable to the plant.

* Lacunar [O2] can be very high during daytime Ps, or very low at night, presenting interesting physiological challenges.

 

 

HETEROPHYLLY

 

* Heterophylly is a complex phenomenon in which an individual plant has more than one kind of leaf, w/ each leaf form having some or all of the characteristics indicated above. Riemer Figs. 9.4, 9.5; Sculthorpe Figs. 8.10, 8.13

* Present to a limited extent in some terrestrial plants, but is much more widespread and exaggerated among aquatic plants.

* Depending on spp., the various leaf forms may arise in a fixed developmental sequence, and/or may occur opportunistically, e.g. when a submersed plant becomes emersed w/ decreasing water level.

* Failure of many systematists to distinguish pheno- vs. genotypic plasticity has led to much taxonomic confusion because of irregular heterophylly, hence the reliance on floral characters for definitive identification (though even these are variable).

* Differences between leaf types may be physiological as well as morphological.

* Exogenous factors that may trigger development of floating or aerial leaves from a submerged stem upon nearing the surface probably vary w/ spp., and include low atm. [CO2], high temp., long photoperiods, and the far red to red ratio.

* In many cases the floating/aerial leaves develop while still underwater, so endogenous factors may be important, e.g. carbohydrate or nutrient status of the shoot meristem.

 

 

UNDERGROUND ORGANS

 

* Two principal functions: anchorage and nutrient absorption.

* Two major problems: substrate instability (silting and erosion) and anoxia (along w/ high CO2, CH4, and S2-).

* Substrate instability "solved" by vigorous rhizomes & fibrous adventitious roots to bind sediment particles.

* Rhizome/root network in emergents may equal or even exceed (by up to 4x in Phragmites communis and Equisetum fluviatile) the biomass of aerial foliage; varies w/ local conditions Wetzel Table 18-3

* Rhizome morphology and growth rate varies widely among spp.

* Profuse root hairs typical in emergents & floating-leaved hydrophytes.

* Smaller hydrophytes (e.g. Myriophyllum, Potamogeton, Marsilea) tend to have more delicate, but profusely branched rhizomes w/ matted fibrous roots; adventitious roots often spirally coiled (to aid anchorage?).

* Rosette hydrophytes w/ radical leaves have variable root morphology, ranging from slender/soft to bulbous/succulent or hard/cormlike, and many spread by stolons.

* Extensive lacunae in roots and/or rhizome (continuous w/ that of stems) are common but not universal in all hydrophytes.

* O2 gradient from leaves to roots drives downward O2 diffusion to support aerobic respiration. Darkness at night or low PFD in dense stands, and high temp. decreases O2 supply. Root growth typically inhibited in low [O2], but some actually grow best in very low O2!

* Some emergents may at times transport enough O2 to oxygenate the surrounding sediments, and some tolerate anaerobic respiration (producing ethanol) during prolonged anoxia.

* It has been argued that lacunae also may increase mechanical strength w/ no additional respiratory demand.

* In emergents it is widely agreed that the roots provide most of the water and nutrients to the entire plant. The relative importance of roots vs. shoots in nutrient uptake is less clear in floating-leaved and submerged spp., but at least N & P are probably obtained mainly from sediments in these plants also. This is an important area of uncertainty since it determines the extent to which macrophytes are sources vs. sinks of nutrients to the water column.

* Barko et al. (1991. Aquat. Bot. 41:41-65) reviewed this topic and concluded that submersed macrophytes both control and are controlled by sediment nutrients. Shifts in spp. composition often reflect changing sediment properties. They present the following generalization of primary sources of specific nutrients to submersed macrophytes:

* sediment: N, P, Fe, Mn, trace metals: these elements may thus be "pumped" by macrophytes from sediments to water column upon senescence/decomposition.

* water column: Ca, Mg, Na, K, SO4, Cl

Moreover, they conclude that most submersed macrophytes are not likely to be P-limited (!) because of the high exchangeable [P] in most, but not all, lake sediments; N limitiation is sometimes evident.

* Barko & Smart (1986. Ecology 67:1328-1340.) demonstrated a positive relationship between sediment density (which is an inverse curvilinear function of organic content) and macrophyte (Hydrilla, Myriophyllum) growth. The effect seems to be indirect: sed. density determines nutrient diffusivity and availability.

 

 

FREE-FLOATING PLANTS

 

* The free-floating (pleustonic) habit is very common and diverse, including some of the most widespread and abundant hydrophytes (e.g. Lemna, Salvinia, Pistia).

* Morphology ranges from the tiny and simple Wolffia to elaborate rosette forms such as Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth, a monocot) and Trapa natans (a dicot), most but not all having dangling roots.

* Evolutionary trend toward reduction in pteridophytes (Azolla, Salvinia), monocots (e.g. Lemnaceae) and dicots (e.g. Utricularia, which lacks roots); rosette spp. more primitive.

* Some spp. of Lemnaceae, Utricularia, etc. "float" below sfc. but still produce aerial flowers.

* Generally restricted to sheltered habitats, incl. slow-flowing rivers; all nutrition must come from water, so largely restricted to high ionic strength/high nutrient waters.

 

Rosette species

* Stoloniferous and can form dense mats rapidly.

* Perennial and free-floating except for early seedling development.

* Variably dorsiventrally differentiated leaves, depending on floating vs. emergent habit.</