NOTE: All of the remaining
Divisions have typical higher plant pigments: chl a, b; beta-carotene,
several xanthophylls (e.g. lutein, neoxanthin, violaxanthin, zeaxanthin)
DIVISIONS HEPATOPHYTA & ANTHOCEROTOPHYTA
hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) predominantly
terrestrial; Anthoceros
rarely in permanent lakes
liverworts (Hepatophyta) also mainly
terrestrial, but many spp. have aquatic morphs (different from terrestrial
forms), esp. in lotic, less commonly in lacustrine waters:
Riccia fairly common along the edge, Ricciocarpus
is pleustonic (floating), much like Lemna; both favor eutrophic water Hutch. III, Figs. 22, 23
DIVISION BRYOPHYTA (Mosses)
Hutchinson II, Fig.
4; III, Fig.
24
Order
Sphagnales
common in low-Ca, acidic damps soils to lake
margins
some spp. submergent, others floating mats:
quaking bogs = terminal phase of acid lake history
lake margin Sphagnum communities
often have complex spp. zonations related to moisture content, pH, light
(shading by trees/shrubs)
Order
Bryales
favor soft & moderately hard waters: cannot
use HCO3- in photosynthesis
most common in lotic, but also present in
lacustrine habitats, up to 120 m in Lake Tahoe
like liverworts & Charophytes, can grow
much deeper (lower light) than angiosperms, and compete well w/ latter only
when substrate is rocky therefore unfavorable for angiosperms
growth at great depth possible only in clear,
oligotrophic lakes, so mosses decrease with eutrophication
common, largely aquatic genera incl. Fissidens,
Fontinalis,
Drepanocladus
TRACHEOPHYTES (Vascular Plants)
subsequent to explosive colonization of land by
tracheophytes, a few (1-2%) secondarily adapted to FW (and even
fewer into the sea)
many retain relics of terrestrial existence,
e.g. a thin cuticle, vestigial stomata, poorly lignified xylem, nonmotile
sperm, aerial pollination (most), the latter often insect assisted
aquatic tracheophytes a phylogenetically
complex, polyphyletic assemblage
most rooted in substratum, some free-floating
in or on water, a few epiphytic
morphological reduction common, both vegetative
& reproductive
relevance to humans stems largely from
perceived "nuisance" status, interfering w/ navigation, fisheries,
irrigation, etc.
DIVISION
MICROPHYLLOPHYTA (=
subdivision Lycopsida)
vascularized leaves & roots; sporophylls w/
adaxial sporangia
1. Lycopodium
("club mosses", though not really a moss (Bryophyta))
lacks ligules, small membranous
appendages at base of "leaves"
most are terrestrial, but L. inundatum
occurs in marginal or eulittoral flora in the Arctic
2. Isoetes spp.
("quillworts") Hutch.
III, Fig.
26
cosmopolitan, esp. in unproductive softwater
lakes
rosettelike w/ simple, unbranched leaves from
an underground "corm"
readily outcompeted by angiosperms
primitive vascular anatomy
DIVISION
ARTHROPHYTA
("jointed plants")
sole extant genus is Equisetum (= horsetail
rushes) Bold
et al. Fig. 15-1
common emergent plant in north temperate lakes
(up to 1.5 m deep)
whorled leaves & branches which arise
alternately from stem nodes (very unusual)
stem is the dominant organ, w/ leaves greatly
reduced & essentially vestigial
DIVISION
PTERIDOPHYTA
(Ferns)
Ceratopteris - pan(sub)tropical genus, pleustonic at or near surface Hutch. II, Fig. 4H
Order Marsilales/ Family Marsileaceae (water clovers) - incl. 3 widespread (esp. warmer areas) genera, 2 occurring in Oklahoma: Marsilea ("water clover"; quadrifoliate leaves) & Pilularia ("pillwort"; filiform leaves) Hutch. II, Fig. 4G
perennial herbs rooting in shallow water or
moist soil
erect, spreading or floating leaves
sexual reprod. by sporocarps borne from
rhizome; contain both micro- & megaspores
Order Salviniales/ Family Salviniaceae (water ferns) - only 2 extant genera, widespread esp. in warmer climates: Azolla & Salvinia (most spp. native to Africa, only 1 in U.S.), only the former known from OK Hutch. II, Fig. 4E,F
small floating plants, plants monoecious but
us. w/ dioecious sporocarps
Azolla
- branching stems, alternate bilobed leaves, true roots, and hosts symbiotic Anabaena
azollae (Cyanophyta) which probably fixes N2
Salvinia - simple
(unlobed) leaves, lacks true roots (modified filiform leaf segments)
DIVISION
CONIFEROPHYTA
(Gymnosperms)
Gymnosperms in general are
notably absent from aquatic habitats. In southeastern U.S., Taxodium
distichum (cypress) is a common swamp/wetland tree. Hutchinson
considers it of marginal limnological importance.
DIVISION
ANTHOPHYTA (Angiosperms
or flowering plants)
Difficult to define aquatic angiosperms b/c
many or most terrestrial plants may at some time become submersed.
Sculthorpe lists 28 families (excluding
Pteridophytes) of "more or less exclusive hydrophytes", 4 of which
are all or predominantly marine/brackish.
Of the 24 FW families sensu Sculthorpe, 14 are
listed by Nelson & Couch and 3 more by Tyrl as having OK reps; most of the
remaining 7 families are (sub)tropical. However, Nelson & Couch list 9
other families not included by Sculthorpe. Obviously, it is a subjective call,
esp. on local/regional scale where only one or a few oddball spp. from a family
may occur.
Sculthorpe Table 1.2a,
b; Hutch. III, Table 6; Raven et
al. Table 16-1
In general, hydrophytes believed to be
evolutionarily recent descendents of terrestrial ancestors*, and as a rule
favor high light (shallow water). Phylogeny seems uncertain. *An exception may
be Ceratophyllum, which DNA evidence suggests to be one of the most
basal clades of angiosperms (see Raven et al. 1999, p. 526).
Whereas in terrestrial plants dicots outnumber
monocots by 4:1 or 5:1, FW monocots outnumber dicots, esp. in lentic/lacustrine
systems.
Among dicots the Ranales (prob. most nearly
albeit distantly related to monocots) are the best represented order, while the
largest dicot family, Asteraceae, has few aquatic spp., as do the woody
families.
Hutchinson (Vol. III, p.
80) summarizes as follows:
"A
number of otherwise terrestrial families may contain isolated aquatic genera
and species, but most of the characteristic lacustrine plants, particularly
those that are submersed, belong to a restricted number of specialized families
containing few genera of immensely wide distribution.... Within such widely
distributed genera, there are sometimes, as in Potamogeton, very many
spp., but more usually the number of species is quite small.... The range of
the average species of water plant is greater than that of the average land
plant*.... Within a genus, large or small, species of immense range, e.g. P.
crispus and Ceratophyllum demersum, may occur... essentially
throughout the world."
* I presume this reflects
the susceptibility of terrestrial but not aquatic plants to water availability
and temperature extremes.
Life
Forms/Ecological Classification of Tracheophytes
Ecological perspective: life/growth form of
aquatic plants prob. more useful than phylogeny.
Bases for categories incl. morphological
similarities (convergence) and/or habitat characteristics, namely relation to
water level and substratum.
Sculthorpe Table
1.1; Hutch.
III, Table 7; Riemer Fig.
6.1
Hutchinson notes the
following generalizations (no doubt many exceptions; refer to Table 7 for
codes):
|
larger, oligotrophic, exposed lakes |
graminid emergents
(B.I.a) nearshore floating-leaved plants (B.II.a,b) sheltered
"offshore" * submerged isoetid rosulates (B.III.b.3) |
|
smaller, eutrophic, sheltered lakes |
more foliaceous emergents (B.I.f) nearshore more prominent
floating-leaved flora * submerged plants dominated by vittate forms (B.III.a) |
* This distinction may
suggest differential relative reliance on sediments vs. water column for
nutrition.
Salviniids (A.I.b) and eichhornids (A.I.d; e.g.
water hyacinth) are often transitory pests.
Smaller pleustonic spp. (A.I.a) are mainly in
the littoral of eutrophic lakes.
Other pleustonic plants (A.I.c,e) occur
lakeward of floating-leaved plants.
Vascular
Plant Biogeography (Sculthorpe)
~30-35% hydrophytes =
cosmopolitan/intercontinental (esp. north temperate zone w/ large contiguous
land mass); difficult to explain given wide separation of populations by land
masses and oceans: spread by migratory waterfowl?
~40% hydrophytes = continental/regional; this
is a much lower % than for terrestrial plants
~25-30% hydrophytes = endemic (very restricted)
spp.; mostly tropical forms
Hydrophyte (or any
organism) biogeography should not be thought of as static: ranges are
constantly and presently expanding and contracting.
EMERGENT
FOLIAGE: STRUCTURE & PHYSIOLOGY
Remember that hydrophytes evolved
from terrestrial ancestors, NOT directly from more primitive aquatic forms, and
most retain some traits that are maladaptive to aquatic existence
No major differences in anatomy of
emergent structures of hydrophytes vs. terrestrial plants
Young, initially submerged foliage
must often tolerate low O2, and usually form arenchyma tissue near the water
surface
Subtle changes in still submerged
developing plants include:
decreased leaf thickness &
hairiness, stomatal density and cuticle thickness
leaf shape alterations
increased spongy mesophyll volume
Emergent
Leaves
1. Monocots (e.g. Typha, Phragmites)
rhizomatous w/ more or less linear
leaves
stomata on all surfaces of leaves
typically no palisade/spongy
mesophyll distinction
colorless epidermal cells (except
guard cells)
generally typical monocot vascular
bundle anatomy & cell types
2. Dicots (e.g. Ludwigia)
most produce erect leafy stems, w/
leaves having typical terrestrial dicot anatomy
often stomata on both surfaces
colorless epidermal cells (except
guard cells)
distinct upper palisade/lower
spongy mesophyll
petiole w/ ring of widely spaced
vascular bundles in transsection and lacunate cortex
3. Physiology
main problem is hypoxia below
water, esp. near sediment: prolonged anaerobic resp.?
Extensive lacunal system in
mesophyll continuous through petiole, stem & rhizomes/roots provides
channel for O2 diffusion, aided by Ps O2 evolution during
day.
Emergent hydrophytes transpire
freely, esp. during day; some also show guttation.
Depending on spp., aerenchyma near the water sfc. formed from either
the vascular or cork cambium (latter = phellogen);
basically, aerenchyma seems to be a specialized form of cork
Organs possessing aerenchyma often
lack an extensive lacunar system, so
may serve as O2 storing tissue and/or for floatation; seems
NOT to be respiratory tissue. Sculthorpe Fig.
3.3
4. Effects
of submergence
Although variable w/ spp., often
submersed leaves are longer and narrower than emergent leaves of the same sp. Sculthorpe
Figs.
3.5, 3.6
Other, mainly quantitative, alterations
frequently observed upon submersion include:
more erect stems, longer
internodes, sparser branching and root development
decreased leaf thickness,
hairiness (glabrous
= without hair) & Chl content
increased non-photosynthetic
pigments (anthocyanins, anthoxanthins)
increased spongy relative to
palisade mesophyll thus increased air spaces
development of chloroplasts in
epidermis and altered stomatal distribution
decreased xylem & supportive
tissue and increased lacunar development in submersed stems
FLOATING
LEAVES: STRUCTURE & PHYSIOLOGY
Strong selective pressures on
floating leaves have resulted in striking parallel evolution in all plants of
this type regardless of phylogeny.
Major problem is physical stress
of wind, waves, rain: favors leathery, circular, entire, peltate (attached in center) leaves
w/ long flexible petioles and collenchyma-reinforced primary veins, more or
less evident in various families; still, most
floating-leaved plants are restricted to relatively calm and shallow waters. Sculthorpe
Figs. 4.1,
4.2
Another unique problem = exposure
to both air & water: thick cuticle and functional stomata only on upper
sfc. for gas exchange (sporadic relict stomata on lower sfc.); upper palisade
mesophyll w/ extensive lacunate spongy mesophyll of columnar cells; latter aids
buoyancy while structural tissue adds strength. Sculthorpe Figs. 4.8,
4.9A
With a 2-dimensional space to
array leaves, competition for light is intense: long petioles or stems permit
spreading of leaves to avoid overlap, which nevertheless occurs in dense
stands.
Petioles rapidly resume growth
(both cell division & elongation) if leaves become submerged.
The causal factor(s) of growth
cessation at the air/water interface are not known, and occasionally some spp.
(Nuphar, Nymphaea) will produce
emergent leaves in dense stands.
Floating leaf primordia from a
benthic rhizome may take years to develop, and early development in water again
may be hypoxic and require high osmotic pressure in the cells.
Typically lack vessels, having
only tracheids in xylem.
Stranded plants of
emersion-tolerant spp. form close rosettes of reduced leaves w/ fewer stomata
and infurled margins.
SUBMERGED
ORGANS
Morphology
Greatly decreased structural
support tissue, unlignified, us. w/ little or no collenchyma/sclerenchyma;
greatly reduced mesophyll w/ little dorsiventral differentiation due to random
orientation of leaves toward light Sculthorpe
Fig.
5.10
Extremely thin cuticle and leaves,
and presence of chloroplasts in epidermis (sometimes more than in mesophyll,
e.g. spp. of Ceratophyllum, Myriophyllum,
Potamogeton), mimic terrestrial shade leaves, and probably reflect low PFD
rather than adaptations to aquatic existence per se.
Two major growth forms based on
differing apical organization:
1. flat,
broad shoot apex: short axis producing rosette of radical leaves (directly from roots; e.g. Isoetes)
2. long,
narrow shoot apex: elongated flexuous stem covered w/ leaves and rooted
(sometimes sparsely) from nodes (e.g. Elodea)
leaves either alternate (e.g. Potamogeton), paired/opposite (e.g. Cabomba) or whorled (e.g. Elodea, Myriophyllum)
sympodial growth
(no dominant shoot axis), older tissues dying
axillary buds may occur at every
leaf or only at intervals of 2-12 nodes (spp.-dependent)
Three main types of leaves, only
two of which are common:
1. entire: most common in both mono- and dicots of all
habitats and climate zones
us. thin, translucent, very
elongate (esp. in rosette spp.)
variously filiform or setaceous
(e.g. Potamogeton pectinatus), small
linear (e.g. Elodea) or ribbon-like
(e.g. P. spp., Sagittaria spp.); and flat, undulate or bullate according to spp.
2. dissected: common in many dicots from tropics to
temperate waters
many free segments radiating from
petiole, w/ various orders of dissection and length/thickness depending on sp.
and conditions
putative benefit of increased SA:V
ratio relative to entire leaves not definitively demonstrated
Physiology
Gas diffusion through water is
100-1000x slower than in air, and PFD is reduced, so SA:V and boundary layers
are important factors in hydrophyte physiology.
Typical anatomical features, e.g.
thin leaves, cell walls & cuticle, and extensive air spaces facilitate
dissolved gas and ion diffusion to/from cells
HCO3- as well as CO2 can be
used for photosynthesis in many submerged macrophytes Spence & Maberly Tables
III,
IV, VI,
VII
Note: [Ct] = [DIC] = [CO2 (aq)]
+ [HCO3-] + [CO32-] (HCO3- us. dominates)
Alk = [HCO3-] + 2[CO32-] + [OH-] - [H+]
Ct/Alk = quotient of final [Ct]
over alkalinity in a pH-drift expt. A
low value means little Ct
remains after Ps uptake, a high value means most Ct in sol'n is
photosynthetically unavailable to the plant.
Lacunar [O2] can be
very high during daytime Ps, or very low at night, presenting interesting
physiological challenges.
HETEROPHYLLY
Heterophylly is a
complex phenomenon in which an individual plant has more than one kind of leaf,
w/ each leaf form having some or all of the characteristics indicated
above. Riemer Figs. 9.4,
9.5; Sculthorpe Figs. 8.10,
8.13
Present to a limited extent in
some terrestrial plants, but is much more widespread and exaggerated among
aquatic plants.
Depending on spp., the various
leaf forms may arise in a fixed developmental sequence, and/or may occur
opportunistically, e.g. when a submersed plant becomes emersed w/ decreasing
water level.
Failure of many systematists to
distinguish pheno- vs. genotypic plasticity has led to much taxonomic confusion
because of irregular heterophylly, hence the reliance on floral characters for
definitive identification (though even these are variable).
Differences between leaf types may
be physiological as well as morphological.
Exogenous factors that may trigger
development of floating or aerial leaves from a submerged stem upon nearing the
surface probably vary w/ spp., and include low atm. [CO2], high
temp., long photoperiods, and the far red to red ratio.
In many cases the floating/aerial
leaves develop while still underwater, so endogenous factors may be important,
e.g. carbohydrate or nutrient status of the shoot meristem.
UNDERGROUND
ORGANS
Two principal functions: anchorage
and nutrient absorption.
Two major problems: substrate
instability (silting and erosion) and anoxia (along w/ high CO2, CH4,
and S2-).
Substrate instability
"solved" by vigorous rhizomes & fibrous adventitious roots to
bind sediment particles.
Rhizome/root network in emergents
may equal or even exceed (by up to 4x in Phragmites
communis and Equisetum fluviatile)
the biomass of aerial foliage; varies w/ local conditions Wetzel
Table
18-3
Rhizome morphology and growth rate
varies widely among spp.
Profuse root hairs typical in
emergents & floating-leaved hydrophytes.
Smaller hydrophytes (e.g. Myriophyllum, Potamogeton, Marsilea)
tend to have more delicate, but profusely branched rhizomes w/ matted fibrous
roots; adventitious roots often spirally coiled (to aid anchorage?).
Rosette hydrophytes w/ radical
leaves have variable root morphology, ranging from slender/soft to
bulbous/succulent or hard/cormlike, and many spread by stolons.
Extensive lacunae in roots and/or
rhizome (continuous w/ that of stems) are common but not universal in all
hydrophytes.
O2 gradient from leaves
to roots drives downward O2 diffusion to support aerobic
respiration. Darkness at night or low
PFD in dense stands, and high temp. decreases O2 supply. Root growth typically inhibited in low [O2],
but some actually grow best in very low O2!
Some emergents may at times
transport enough O2 to oxygenate the surrounding sediments, and some
tolerate anaerobic respiration (producing ethanol) during prolonged anoxia.
It has been argued that lacunae
also may increase mechanical strength w/ no additional respiratory demand.
In emergents it is widely agreed
that the roots provide most of the water and nutrients to the entire
plant. The relative importance of roots
vs. shoots in nutrient uptake is less clear in floating-leaved and submerged
spp., but at least N & P are probably obtained mainly from sediments in
these plants also. This is an important area of
uncertainty since it determines the extent to which macrophytes are sources vs.
sinks of nutrients to the water column.
Barko et al. (1991. Aquat. Bot.
41:41-65) reviewed this topic and concluded that submersed macrophytes both
control and are controlled by sediment nutrients. Shifts in spp. composition often reflect changing sediment
properties. They present the following generalization of primary sources of
specific nutrients to submersed macrophytes:
sediment: N, P, Fe, Mn, trace metals:
these elements may thus be "pumped" by macrophytes from
sediments to water column upon senescence/decomposition.
water column: Ca, Mg, Na, K, SO4, Cl
Moreover,
they conclude that most submersed
macrophytes are not likely to be
P-limited (!) because of the high exchangeable [P] in most, but not all,
lake sediments; N limitiation is sometimes evident.
Barko & Smart (1986. Ecology
67:1328-1340.) demonstrated a positive relationship between sediment density
(which is an inverse curvilinear function of organic content) and macrophyte (Hydrilla, Myriophyllum) growth. The effect seems to be indirect: sed.
density determines nutrient diffusivity and availability.
FREE-FLOATING PLANTS
The free-floating (pleustonic)
habit is very common and diverse, including some of the most widespread and
abundant hydrophytes (e.g. Lemna,
Salvinia, Pistia).
Morphology ranges from the tiny
and simple Wolffia to elaborate
rosette forms such as Eichhornia
crassipes (water hyacinth, a monocot) and Trapa natans (a dicot), most but not all having dangling
roots.
Evolutionary trend toward
reduction in pteridophytes (Azolla,
Salvinia), monocots (e.g. Lemnaceae) and dicots (e.g. Utricularia, which lacks roots); rosette spp. more primitive.
Some spp. of Lemnaceae, Utricularia, etc. "float"
below sfc. but still produce aerial flowers.
Generally restricted to sheltered
habitats, incl. slow-flowing rivers; all nutrition must come from water, so
largely restricted to high ionic strength/high nutrient waters.
Rosette
species
Stoloniferous and can form dense
mats rapidly.
Perennial and free-floating except
for early seedling development.
Variably dorsiventrally
differentiated leaves, depending on floating vs. emergent habit.